Re: Arbitrary Constraints

From: Tony Andrews <andrewst_at_onetel.com>
Date: 26 Oct 2004 11:49:17 -0700
Message-ID: <1098816557.433482.46230_at_z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>

Kenneth Downs wrote:
> This logic belongs in the UI.

I fundamentally disagree - 100%. It does not, IMO. It may be duplicated in the UI for user convenience, but it should be enforced by the DBMS. Otherwise your UI *is* built on sand! What is your logic for saying it belongs in the UI - other than that may be (with current DBMSs) hard to do in the DBMS? Received on Tue Oct 26 2004 - 20:49:17 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Tony Andrews: "Re: Arbitrary Constraints"
Previous message: Bill H: "Re: By The Dawn's Normal Light"
In reply to Kenneth Downs: "Re: Arbitrary Constraints"
Next in thread: Kenneth Downs: "Re: Arbitrary Constraints"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message