Re: Argument for 1NF by counter-example
From: Laconic2 <laconic2_at_comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:25:35 -0400
Message-ID: <f_idnbvYxNdHY-HcRVn-tw_at_comcast.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 09:25:35 -0400
Message-ID: <f_idnbvYxNdHY-HcRVn-tw_at_comcast.com>
"Marshall Spight" <mspight_at_dnai.com> wrote in message
news:9L%ed.301498$MQ5.216387_at_attbi_s52...
> "Laconic2" <laconic2_at_comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1dCdncVMDNCImuHcRVn-vA_at_comcast.com...
> >
> > You can strengthen your argument without resorting to name calling.
>
> Actually, I don't think it's proven yet that he can. If you know what
> I mean.
He's demonstrated the ability to make useful posts with new ideas in them in the past, IMO. Received on Mon Oct 25 2004 - 15:25:35 CEST