Re: By The Dawn's Normal Light
From: Alfredo Novoa <alfredo_at_ncs.es>
Date: 25 Oct 2004 03:33:10 -0700
Message-ID: <e4330f45.0410250233.418c186d_at_posting.google.com>
Date: 25 Oct 2004 03:33:10 -0700
Message-ID: <e4330f45.0410250233.418c186d_at_posting.google.com>
"Laconic2" <laconic2_at_comcast.net> wrote in message news:<SqidnbRl2KA1KebcRVn-sw_at_comcast.com>...
> A little while ago, when I asked about "correct" definitions, Marshall
> suggested that there is no such thing as "correct" with regard to a
> definition. Do you agree with Marshall's comment? I'm not asking about my
> paraphrase of it here.
I can't find Marshall's post, but I am surprised. I can't disagree more.
> Can you tell me what you mean by "properly"? It is the same as or different
> from "Correctly"? "Usefully"?
Correctly
Regards Received on Mon Oct 25 2004 - 12:33:10 CEST