Re: Argument for 1NF by counter-example
From: Marshall Spight <mspight_at_dnai.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 04:59:49 GMT
Message-ID: <9L%ed.301498$MQ5.216387_at_attbi_s52>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 04:59:49 GMT
Message-ID: <9L%ed.301498$MQ5.216387_at_attbi_s52>
"Laconic2" <laconic2_at_comcast.net> wrote in message news:1dCdncVMDNCImuHcRVn-vA_at_comcast.com...
>
> You can strengthen your argument without resorting to name calling.
Actually, I don't think it's proven yet that he can. If you know what I mean.
Marshall Received on Mon Oct 25 2004 - 06:59:49 CEST