Re: Argument for 1NF by counter-example
Date: 24 Oct 2004 10:56:28 -0700
Message-ID: <da3c2186.0410240956.76e4a5d1_at_posting.google.com>
"Dawn M. Wolthuis" <dwolt_at_tincat-group.comREMOVE> wrote in message news:<clf2ij$64q$1_at_news.netins.net>...
<snip>
> Once XQuery includes update capabilities will that be the language on which
> to hang our collective hat? Right now I'd give it at least a 70% chance.
> That doesn't mean that SQL will go away (any more than COBOL has) but that
> new database implementations will use more flexible structures with an
> XQuery language, perhaps? Just thinking outloud. --dawn
if you can refute say, Pascal's, objections to XQuery (lots of other thoughtful people have published on the futility of XML/XQuery, so you're free to pick another); then i'll listen to this drivel.
BobTheDataBaseBoy Received on Sun Oct 24 2004 - 19:56:28 CEST