Re: By The Dawn's Normal Light

From: Alfredo Novoa <anovoa_at_ncs.es>
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 04:32:49 +0200
Message-ID: <725mn0ljhdnjbmqjvqke337evgt0qu4ds7@4ax.com>

On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 16:14:09 -0500, "Dawn M. Wolthuis" <dwolt_at_tincat-group.comREMOVE> wrote:

>"Alfredo Novoa" <alfredo_at_ncs.es> wrote in message
>news:41790ed8.100609359_at_news.wanadoo.es...
>> On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:06:51 -0400, "Laconic2" <laconic2_at_comcast.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >> 1NF is superfluous, a relation is always in 1NF
>> >
>> >Do Date&Darwen agree with this?
>>
>> Yes, I learned that in Date's "Intro".
>
>They agreed with it before they redefined 1NF and then after they redefined
>it (or "understood it differently" -- however you want to say it).

They agreed with it after they defined 1NF properly.

Regards Received on Sat Oct 23 2004 - 21:32:49 CDT