Re: By The Dawn's Normal Light
From: Dawn M. Wolthuis <dwolt_at_tincat-group.comREMOVE>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 16:14:09 -0500
Message-ID: <clbt7b$bps$1_at_news.netins.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 16:14:09 -0500
Message-ID: <clbt7b$bps$1_at_news.netins.net>
"Alfredo Novoa" <alfredo_at_ncs.es> wrote in message
news:41790ed8.100609359_at_news.wanadoo.es...
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 09:06:51 -0400, "Laconic2" <laconic2_at_comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
> >> 1NF is superfluous, a relation is always in 1NF
> >
> >Do Date&Darwen agree with this?
>
> Yes, I learned that in Date's "Intro".
They agreed with it before they redefined 1NF and then after they redefined it (or "understood it differently" -- however you want to say it).
--dawn Received on Fri Oct 22 2004 - 23:14:09 CEST