| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: 4 the FAQ: Are Commercial DBMS Truly Relational?
Christopher Browne wrote:
> Clinging to sanity, Andrew McDonagh <news_at_andrewcdonagh.f2s.com> mumbled into her beard:
>
>>Laconic2 wrote: >> >>>"Paul" <paul_at_test.com> wrote in message >>>news:41690aad$0$59441$ed2619ec_at_ptn-nntp-reader03.plus.net... >> >>Snipped >> >> >>>There is a widespread belief in this field that wrong answers with >>>good performance are closer to the goal line than correct answers >>>with poor performance. I will never come around to that point of >>>view. I almost always want to get it right, first, then work on >>>getting it right, and fast. >> >>I agree, its usually a case of 'premature optimisation'... i.e. they >>use these 'tricks' for optimisation thinking that will create >>performance benefits, but usually the real bottle necks are else >>where within the system. Therefore applying these tricks only serve >>to complicate the matter.
Horses_for_courses
If there's a requirement that says approximations are fine, then yes you are correct.
Or if there's a requirement that correct (i.e. no approximations) is required but must 'run like the wind', then the design can and probably will be changed to accomplish this.
But, if neither requirement is made, then the design should always over rule speed.
And from my own experience, accomplishing the correct answer quickly, can usually be achieved whilst still maintaining a good design. Usually the design is different to the original one, but it is equally 'good'.
Andrew Received on Mon Oct 11 2004 - 17:12:30 CDT
![]() |
![]() |