Re: 4 the FAQ: Are Commercial DBMS Truly Relational?
From: Andrew McDonagh <news_at_andrewcdonagh.f2s.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 23:02:56 +0100
Message-ID: <ckcbip$7de$1_at_news.freedom2surf.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 23:02:56 +0100
Message-ID: <ckcbip$7de$1_at_news.freedom2surf.net>
Gene Wirchenko wrote:
> Andrew McDonagh <news_at_andrewcdonagh.f2s.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Laconic2 wrote: >> >>>"Paul" <paul_at_test.com> wrote in message >>>news:41690aad$0$59441$ed2619ec_at_ptn-nntp-reader03.plus.net...
Snipped
> As it was worded in one newsgroup I follow: "How fast do you want
> your wrong answers?"
Thats brilliant, I'll use that.
snipped
> They also obfuscate the algorithm, so they are particularly nasty
> when the code has a bug.
and
>
> If you really need the performance boost, micro-fiddling usually
> will not do it; you need a better algorithm.
>
which is a much clearer way of saying what I was trying too. :-)
Andrew Received on Mon Oct 11 2004 - 00:02:56 CEST