Re: Theory IS Practical.

From: Laconic2 <laconic2_at_comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 23:01:15 -0400
Message-ID: <SvOdnW5VH92RO_XcRVn-iw_at_comcast.com>

"Marshall Spight" <mspight_at_dnai.com> wrote in message news:VQ%9d.363831$Fg5.21121_at_attbi_s53...
> "Kenneth Downs" <firstinit.lastname_at_lastnameplusfam.net> wrote in message
news:b9f9kc.oo1.ln_at_mercury.downsfam.net...
> >
> > Ralph Kimball, will do.
>
> Didn't he have a run-in with a one-armed man?
>
>
> Marshall
>
>
No, no, Marshall, that was RICHARD Kimball. You been listening to miss Kitty too much, Marshall. Received on Sun Oct 10 2004 - 05:01:15 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Laconic2: "Re: 4 the FAQ: Are Commercial DBMS Truly Relational?"
Previous message: Christopher Browne: "Re: 4 the FAQ: Are Commercial DBMS Truly Relational?"
Maybe in reply to: Laconic2: "Theory IS Practical."
In reply to Marshall Spight: "Re: Theory IS Practical."
Next in thread: Laconic2: "Re: 4 the FAQ: Are Commercial DBMS Truly Relational?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message