Re: 4 the FAQ: Are Commercial DBMS Truly Relational?
From: Kenneth Downs <firstinit.lastname_at_lastnameplusfam.net>
Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2004 10:33:21 -0400
Message-ID: <irs8kc.9nv.ln_at_mercury.downsfam.net>
> Another objection is this: in mathematics, a relation has no need for
> NULLS. Every tuple is a distinct point in the same space.
> A row with a NULL in it is projected onto a subspace of the original
> space.
>
Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2004 10:33:21 -0400
Message-ID: <irs8kc.9nv.ln_at_mercury.downsfam.net>
Laconic2 wrote:
>
>> >> What are some of the other objections? >>
> Another objection is this: in mathematics, a relation has no need for
> NULLS. Every tuple is a distinct point in the same space.
> A row with a NULL in it is projected onto a subspace of the original
> space.
>
>
> In my consulting practice, I never tried to distinguish between "a true
> relational database" and Oracle, DB2, or SQL Server. It just wouldn't
> have
> helped communication between me and the client's people. And, to tell the
> truth, I regard Oracle as "close enough for practical purposes". This is
> genuine heresy to the true theoreticians. Ask me if I care.
>
>
-- Kenneth Downs Use first initial plus last name at last name plus literal "fam.net" to email meReceived on Sat Oct 09 2004 - 16:33:21 CEST