Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch"

From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 00:45:52 +0200
Message-ID: <4164759e$0$78749$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>

Kenneth Downs wrote:

...

> 3.  Enforce the arbitrary convention that a foreign key definition 


>     causes columns to be placed into the child table that correspond

>     in name and type/precision/scale to the primary key of the

>     parent. 


<delurk>
Not the name.

It would exclude mutliple foreign keys between two tables (ordinary? yes, very). You might want to use the role name for each of them.
</delurk> Received on Wed Oct 06 2004 - 17:45:52 CDT