- Re: data model and design best practices? AB (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 02:32:23 CEST)
- Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Jonathan Leffler (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 07:18:04 CEST)
- Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Kenneth Downs (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 00:40:56 CEST)
- Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Dawn M. Wolthuis (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 01:12:55 CEST)
- Re: Specifying all biz rules in relational data Dawn M. Wolthuis (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 01:17:47 CEST)
- Re: Specifying all biz rules in relational data Anne & Lynn Wheeler (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 02:32:49 CEST)
- Re: Specifying all biz rules in relational data Brian Inglis (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 03:02:24 CEST)
- Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Troels Arvin (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 08:58:39 CEST)
- Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Kenneth Downs (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 14:24:08 CEST)
- Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Kenneth Downs (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 14:45:00 CEST)
- Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Troels Arvin (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 15:02:29 CEST)
- Re: Data model for a web messaging application. Itai (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 15:19:04 CEST)
- Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Laconic2 (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 15:54:26 CEST)
- Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Kenneth Downs (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 15:47:03 CEST)
- Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Laconic2 (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 16:33:09 CEST)
- Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Kenneth Downs (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 16:58:18 CEST)
- Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Tony Andrews (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 17:32:43 CEST)
- Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Marshall Spight (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 18:26:44 CEST)
- Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Marshall Spight (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 18:30:20 CEST)
- Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Marshall Spight (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 18:33:14 CEST)
- Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Kenneth Downs (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 18:49:47 CEST)
- Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Laconic2 (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 19:06:51 CEST)
- Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Kenneth Downs (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 19:00:35 CEST)
- Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Kenneth Downs (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 19:03:35 CEST)
- Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Lemming (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 20:20:04 CEST)
- Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Tony Andrews (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 20:43:42 CEST)
- Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" robert (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 20:52:35 CEST)
- Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Lemming (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 20:52:57 CEST)
- Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Tony Andrews (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 21:01:15 CEST)
- Re: Data model for a web messaging application. John Bell (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 22:14:31 CEST)
- Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Laconic2 (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 22:32:59 CEST)
- Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Lemming (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 22:46:05 CEST)
- Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Kenneth Downs (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 23:14:22 CEST)
- Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Laconic2 (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 23:26:28 CEST)
- Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Kenneth Downs (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 23:25:58 CEST)
- Hierarchical queries and indexes Troels Arvin (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 13:46:48 CEST)
- Last message date: Tue Oct 05 2004 - 23:32:22 CEST
- Archived on: Sun Jun 26 2016 - 14:47:39 CEST
|