comp.databases.theory: by thread

Dawn doesn't like 1NF Marshall Spight (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 11:37:56 CDT)
Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Lemming (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 13:52:57 CDT)
- Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Tony Andrews (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 14:31:05 CDT)
  - Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Lemming (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 15:46:05 CDT)
- Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Laconic2 (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 15:32:59 CDT)
  - Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Lemming (Sun Oct 17 2004 - 17:09:27 CDT)
    - Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Marshall Spight (Sun Oct 17 2004 - 18:03:01 CDT)
      - Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Lemming (Sun Oct 17 2004 - 19:09:44 CDT)
        
        Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Marshall Spight (Mon Oct 18 2004 - 01:18:12 CDT)
        
        Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Laconic2 (Mon Oct 18 2004 - 07:39:08 CDT)
        
        Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Marshall Spight (Mon Oct 18 2004 - 10:16:03 CDT)
      - Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Christopher Browne (Sun Oct 17 2004 - 21:01:51 CDT)
        
        Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Marshall Spight (Mon Oct 18 2004 - 00:55:36 CDT)
        
        Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Laconic2 (Mon Oct 18 2004 - 07:57:02 CDT)
        
        Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Marshall Spight (Mon Oct 18 2004 - 10:21:36 CDT)
        
        Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Laconic2 (Mon Oct 18 2004 - 11:11:41 CDT)
        
        Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Gene Wirchenko (Mon Oct 18 2004 - 11:57:42 CDT)
        
        Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Christopher Browne (Mon Oct 18 2004 - 18:38:55 CDT)
        
        Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Laconic2 (Mon Oct 18 2004 - 20:44:24 CDT)
        Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Marshall Spight (Tue Oct 19 2004 - 00:45:26 CDT)
        
        Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Lemming (Tue Oct 19 2004 - 03:10:45 CDT)
        
        Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Laconic2 (Tue Oct 19 2004 - 06:26:23 CDT)
        
        Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Anne & Lynn Wheeler (Tue Oct 19 2004 - 08:50:57 CDT)
        
        Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Laconic2 (Tue Oct 19 2004 - 09:05:40 CDT)
        
        Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Anne & Lynn Wheeler (Tue Oct 19 2004 - 09:58:24 CDT)
        
        Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Laconic2 (Tue Oct 19 2004 - 10:46:58 CDT)
        
        Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Lemming (Tue Oct 19 2004 - 14:28:22 CDT)
        
        Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Christopher Browne (Tue Oct 19 2004 - 19:34:17 CDT)
        
        Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Laconic2 (Thu Oct 21 2004 - 13:46:11 CDT)
        Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Marshall Spight (Tue Oct 19 2004 - 10:19:06 CDT)
        
        Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Laconic2 (Tue Oct 19 2004 - 10:41:59 CDT)
        Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Christopher Browne (Mon Oct 18 2004 - 18:38:55 CDT)
        
        Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Marshall Spight (Tue Oct 19 2004 - 00:28:49 CDT)
        
        Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Laconic2 (Tue Oct 19 2004 - 06:37:09 CDT)
        
        Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Marshall Spight (Tue Oct 19 2004 - 10:49:09 CDT)
        Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Christopher Browne (Tue Oct 19 2004 - 19:34:16 CDT)
        Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Tony Douglas (Wed Oct 20 2004 - 06:49:48 CDT)
        Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly robert (Mon Oct 18 2004 - 08:42:37 CDT)
        
        Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Christopher Browne (Mon Oct 18 2004 - 09:09:39 CDT)
        
        Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Marshall Spight (Mon Oct 18 2004 - 10:24:03 CDT)
        
        Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Kenneth Downs (Tue Oct 19 2004 - 19:59:48 CDT)
    - Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Laconic2 (Sun Oct 17 2004 - 20:16:12 CDT)
Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Bernard Peek (Thu Oct 07 2004 - 16:57:16 CDT)
Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Jonathan Leffler (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 00:18:04 CDT)
- Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Lemming (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 13:20:04 CDT)
Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Troels Arvin (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 01:58:39 CDT)
- Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Kenneth Downs (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 07:45:00 CDT)
  - Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Troels Arvin (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 08:02:29 CDT)
    - Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Kenneth Downs (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 08:47:03 CDT)
      - Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Laconic2 (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 09:33:09 CDT)
        
        Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Kenneth Downs (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 09:58:18 CDT)
        
        Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" robert (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 13:52:35 CDT)
  - Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Laconic2 (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 08:54:26 CDT)
  - Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Tony Andrews (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 11:40:48 CDT)
    - Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Kenneth Downs (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 12:03:35 CDT)
      - Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Tony Andrews (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 13:43:42 CDT)
        
        Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Kenneth Downs (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 16:25:58 CDT)
        
        Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Tony Andrews (Wed Oct 06 2004 - 08:30:27 CDT)
        
        Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Kenneth Downs (Wed Oct 06 2004 - 13:08:15 CDT)
        
        Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Laconic2 (Wed Oct 06 2004 - 15:40:08 CDT)
        
        Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Kenneth Downs (Wed Oct 06 2004 - 17:48:46 CDT)
        
        Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Laconic2 (Thu Oct 07 2004 - 06:56:39 CDT)
        
        Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Kenneth Downs (Thu Oct 07 2004 - 07:40:27 CDT)
        Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" mAsterdam (Wed Oct 06 2004 - 17:45:52 CDT)
        
        Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Kenneth Downs (Wed Oct 06 2004 - 18:07:50 CDT)
        
        Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" mAsterdam (Wed Oct 06 2004 - 19:36:17 CDT)
        
        Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Kenneth Downs (Wed Oct 06 2004 - 20:05:18 CDT)
        Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Gene Wirchenko (Wed Oct 06 2004 - 20:37:04 CDT)
        
        Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Kenneth Downs (Thu Oct 07 2004 - 07:34:50 CDT)
        Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Laconic2 (Thu Oct 07 2004 - 09:22:26 CDT)
        
        Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Kenneth Downs (Thu Oct 07 2004 - 11:19:13 CDT)
        Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Kenneth Downs (Wed Oct 06 2004 - 13:10:09 CDT)
        
        Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Laconic2 (Wed Oct 06 2004 - 15:32:00 CDT)
        
        Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Kenneth Downs (Wed Oct 06 2004 - 16:14:25 CDT)
        Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Tony Andrews (Thu Oct 07 2004 - 04:17:07 CDT)
        
        Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Laconic2 (Thu Oct 07 2004 - 05:28:53 CDT)
        
        Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Kenneth Downs (Thu Oct 07 2004 - 07:22:43 CDT)
        
        Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Tony Andrews (Thu Oct 07 2004 - 08:37:29 CDT)
        Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Kenneth Downs (Wed Oct 06 2004 - 15:24:23 CDT)
  - Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Tony Andrews (Wed Oct 06 2004 - 10:22:21 CDT)
    - Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Kenneth Downs (Wed Oct 06 2004 - 12:35:56 CDT)
      - Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Laconic2 (Wed Oct 06 2004 - 12:59:34 CDT)
        
        Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Kenneth Downs (Wed Oct 06 2004 - 15:29:28 CDT)
Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Tony Andrews (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 04:24:01 CDT)
- Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Kenneth Downs (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 07:24:08 CDT)
  - Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Tony Andrews (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 10:32:43 CDT)
    - Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Kenneth Downs (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 12:00:35 CDT)
      - Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Tony Andrews (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 14:01:15 CDT)
        
        Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Kenneth Downs (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 16:14:22 CDT)
        
        Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Laconic2 (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 16:26:28 CDT)
        
        Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Kenneth Downs (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 18:43:18 CDT)
        
        Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Laconic2 (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 22:02:27 CDT)
        
        Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Kenneth Downs (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 22:24:10 CDT)
        
        Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Laconic2 (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 23:40:45 CDT)
Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Tony Andrews (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 10:45:13 CDT)
- Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Marshall Spight (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 11:30:20 CDT)
Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Marshall Spight (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 11:26:44 CDT)
- Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Kenneth Downs (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 11:49:47 CDT)
Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" --CELKO-- (Sat Oct 02 2004 - 10:56:42 CDT)
Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Marshall Spight (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 11:33:14 CDT)
- Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Laconic2 (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 12:06:51 CDT)
Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch" Kenneth Downs (Mon Oct 04 2004 - 15:28:11 CDT)
Re: Data model for a web messaging application. Itai (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 08:19:04 CDT)
- Re: Data model for a web messaging application. John Bell (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 15:14:31 CDT)
Hierarchical queries and indexes Troels Arvin (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 06:46:48 CDT)
- Re: Hierarchical queries and indexes --CELKO-- (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 22:34:16 CDT)
- Re: Hierarchical queries and indexes robert (Fri Oct 08 2004 - 10:50:46 CDT)
  - Re: Hierarchical queries and indexes Laconic2 (Fri Oct 08 2004 - 11:17:18 CDT)
  - Re: Hierarchical queries and indexes --CELKO-- (Fri Oct 08 2004 - 19:31:00 CDT)
- Re: Hierarchical queries and indexes Paul (Sat Oct 09 2004 - 07:30:14 CDT)
- Re: Hierarchical queries and indexes Mikito Harakiri (Sun Oct 10 2004 - 21:36:30 CDT)
Client/Server boundary definitions Kenneth Downs (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 10:04:24 CDT)
- Re: Client/Server boundary definitions Kenneth Downs (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 16:32:22 CDT)
ncoa processing internetmogul (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 21:56:42 CDT)
- Re: ncoa processing Kenneth Downs (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 22:14:48 CDT)
  - Re: ncoa processing Paul (Sat Oct 09 2004 - 07:41:05 CDT)
    - Re: ncoa processing Kenneth Downs (Sat Oct 09 2004 - 08:54:50 CDT)
SQL help Robert Stearns (Tue Oct 05 2004 - 23:10:13 CDT)