Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly
From: Lemming <thiswillbounce_at_bumblbee.demon.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 19:20:04 +0100
Message-ID: <aep5m0du0dvau5l6kvmcdbrfmt6sbup38j_at_4ax.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 19:20:04 +0100
Message-ID: <aep5m0du0dvau5l6kvmcdbrfmt6sbup38j_at_4ax.com>
On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 05:18:04 GMT, Jonathan Leffler <jleffler_at_earthlink.net> wrote:
>Lemming wrote:
>> On 4 Oct 2004 13:39:19 -0700, gnuoytr_at_rcn.com (robert) wrote:
>>>as historical perspective, xml as B2B (and to a lesser extent B2C)
>>>implementation of data transport,
>>
>> Please forgive my ignorance: what is B2B (or even B2C?)?
>
>B2B = Business-to-Business
>B2C = Business-to-Consumer
D'Oh. Thanks!
Lemming
-- Curiosity *may* have killed Schrodinger's cat.Received on Tue Oct 05 2004 - 20:20:04 CEST