Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch"
From: Gene Wirchenko <genew_at_mail.ocis.net>
Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2004 11:10:06 -0700
Message-ID: <8te0m01j5qmnn9tisvscnih90g8dcd3u2i_at_4ax.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2004 11:10:06 -0700
Message-ID: <8te0m01j5qmnn9tisvscnih90g8dcd3u2i_at_4ax.com>
mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org> wrote:
[snip]
>The data in your tables need to be consistent
>with eachother at any point in time. This
>restriction is not necessary at the object
>level and may be perceived more as a hindrance
>than as a feature for the objects. During its
>life the object only needs data necessary for
>its required behaviour.
Why is it not necessary for data to be consistent at the object level? (Or another way:) Why is it acceptable for data to be inconsistent at the object level?
[snip]
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:
I have preferences. You have biases. He/She has prejudices.Received on Sun Oct 03 2004 - 20:10:06 CEST