Re: OO and relation "impedance mismatch"

From: Troels Arvin <troels_at_arvin.dk>
Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 21:00:22 +0200
Message-ID: <pan.2004.10.02.19.00.19.368111_at_arvin.dk>


On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 17:23:12 +0200, mAsterdam wrote:
> By now I hoped for a proposal for putting energy
> into a common datatype standard, supported by/supporting
> programming languages and DBMS.

That's certainly a nice thought. For the programming languages, the types would need to be native to the language, or the language should support operator overloading, so that working with the common data types would feel natural.

JDBC already has a number of types to match SQL's, but I haven't met anyone who has standardized on those - probably because Java doesn't offer operator overloading, so working with the SQL-matching types become a pain.

I wonder if anyone has created a set of SQL-matching types for C++?

-- 
Greetings from Troels Arvin, Copenhagen, Denmark
Received on Sat Oct 02 2004 - 21:00:22 CEST

Original text of this message