|
Home ->
Community ->
Usenet ->
comp.databases.theory ->
by date
comp.databases.theory: by date
- Friday, 1 October
- Re: Specifying all biz rules in relational data Laconic2
- Re: Meaning of 1:1, 1:1 generalization, 1:n, 1:n non identifying, n:m mAsterdam
- Re: Some Laws Laconic2
- Re: Some Laws Laconic2
- Re: c.d.theory glossary 0.0.4 [NULL] Laconic2
- Re: Meaning of 1:1, 1:1 generalization, 1:n, 1:n non identifying, n:m Joshua Beall
- Re: Specifying all biz rules in relational data --CELKO--
- Re: Some Laws --CELKO--
- Re: NULL --CELKO--
- Re: Specifying all biz rules in relational data mAsterdam
- Re: Meaning of 1:1, 1:1 generalization, 1:n, 1:n non identifying, n:m mAsterdam
- Re: NULL Dawn M. Wolthuis
- Re: Some Laws Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Some Laws Gene Wirchenko
- Re: Some Laws robert
- Re: Specifying all biz rules in relational data robert
- Re: Some Laws Lemming
- Re: Some Laws Lemming
- Re: Some Laws Lemming
- Re: A possible issue with theory Lemming
- Re: Tables and Views Lemming
- Re: XML: The good, the bad, and the ugly Lemming
- Re: Specifying all biz rules in relational data Alan
- Last message date: Fri Oct 01 2004 - 21:15:11 CDT
- Archived on: Sun Oct 31 2004 - 22:21:06 CST
|
