Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: A question for Mr. Celko

Re: A question for Mr. Celko

From: Jan Hidders <jan.hidders_at_REMOVETHIS.pandora.be>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 22:56:36 GMT
Message-Id: <pan.2004.07.19.22.57.16.709896@REMOVETHIS.pandora.be>


On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 11:13:53 -0700, John Jacob wrote:
>
> In fact, *any* formal system at least as powerful as typographical
> number theory (which a relational language certainly is, even without
> relation-valued attributes) is subject to the Godelian attack, it says
> *nothing whatsoever* about whether or not the system is useful.

Not so fast. The relational algebra corresponds to first-order logic without function symbols, which is a strict subset of FOL with function symbols, and for that Godel is actually our friend because he has shown that we have a complete axiomatization for that, known as Godels completeness theorem. Which, by the way, doesn't mean things get suddenly easy because FOL, even without function symbols, is still undecidable.

Received on Mon Jul 19 2004 - 17:56:36 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US