Re: Entity vs. Table

From: x <x-false_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 13:56:21 +0300
Message-ID: <40d177da$1_at_post.usenet.com>


  • Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****

"Alfredo Novoa" <alfredo_at_ncs.es> wrote in message news:40d164f6.538133_at_news.wanadoo.es...
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 09:23:35 -0400, "Alan" <alan_at_erols.com> wrote:
>
> >> The Relational Model says nothing about the physical level.
> >
> >I am talking about taking a completed relational model design and
> >implementing it. You know, I've designed all the tables and now I'm
typing
> >SQL to build them in the RDBMS.
>
> SQL mixes the logical and the physical levels, but the most part of
> the physical design is created by the SQL DBMS automatically.

I warned you that when you say "SQL" Alan understands "physical model" or "implementation", not "logical model"

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

  • Usenet.com - The #1 Usenet Newsgroup Service on The Planet! *** http://www.usenet.com Unlimited Download - 19 Seperate Servers - 90,000 groups - Uncensored -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Received on Thu Jun 17 2004 - 12:56:21 CEST

Original text of this message