Re: Nearest Common Ancestor Report (XDb1's $1000 Challenge)
From: Neo <neo55592_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 8 Jun 2004 15:00:35 -0700
Message-ID: <4b45d3ad.0406081400.bba6350_at_posting.google.com>
Date: 8 Jun 2004 15:00:35 -0700
Message-ID: <4b45d3ad.0406081400.bba6350_at_posting.google.com>
> > The challenge hasn't change. Understanding of the challenge has. I
> > didn't expect most to understand the entirety of it from the start
> > because of level of genericness and normalization that I desire is
> > uncommon. I expected an iterative process to comparable solution.
>
> Rough translation "I was trying to do wierd ('uncommon') stuff.."
A high degree of normalization (ie to atomic symbols) and genericness (ie to handle any hierarchy) are uncommon, not wierd. Received on Wed Jun 09 2004 - 00:00:35 CEST