Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: Nearest Common Ancestor Report (XDb1's $1000 Challenge)

Re: Nearest Common Ancestor Report (XDb1's $1000 Challenge)

From: Neo <neo55592_at_hotmail.com>
Date: 8 Jun 2004 14:05:28 -0700
Message-ID: <4b45d3ad.0406081305.27212084@posting.google.com>


> You have mangled the concept of "normalization" to the point where any use
> of a foreign key for reference purposes is "redundant" to the primary key it
> relates to.

Within the context of a db, the use of underlying, data-independent links/refs (ie ID 1429476) to the one and only original data within the db is not considered redundant data because:

  1. they are independent of the data being modelled.
  2. they are or should be hidden/inaccessible/transparent to the user.
Received on Tue Jun 08 2004 - 16:05:28 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US