| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: Nearest Common Ancestor Report (XDb1's $1000 Challenge)
> You have mangled the concept of "normalization" to the point where any use
> of a foreign key for reference purposes is "redundant" to the primary key it
> relates to.
Within the context of a db, the use of underlying, data-independent links/refs (ie ID 1429476) to the one and only original data within the db is not considered redundant data because:
![]() |
![]() |