Re: Nearest Common Ancestor Report (XDb1's $1000 Challenge)
From: Jeff Brooks <jeff_brooks_at_nospam.com>
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 21:21:13 GMT
Message-ID: <dPqwc.679894$Ig.382282_at_pd7tw2no>
>
> Because RM solutions (1 and 2) thus far aren't as normalized or
> generic as XDb1's, they fail under a broader scope of data.
Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2004 21:21:13 GMT
Message-ID: <dPqwc.679894$Ig.382282_at_pd7tw2no>
Neo wrote:
>>You still owe me $1000.
>
> Because RM solutions (1 and 2) thus far aren't as normalized or
> generic as XDb1's, they fail under a broader scope of data.
I decided to do a quick look at the xdb1 website. I found the following
limitations posted on the site:
LIMITATIONS
Single-User - It is not a multi-user database.
Transactions - None.
Recovery - None. Regular backups, UPS, stable OS, and reliable PC recommended.
Lol, xdb1 is a pathetic toy. No one in their right mind would rely on it
for data storage.
Jeff Brooks
p.s. Neo your a fraud, and you owe Hugo $1000.