| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: Nearest Common Ancestor Report (XDb1's $1000 Challenge)
> Would either or both of you consider an arbitrator? ::grin::
I could, if ...
Other suggestions:
6. The "2X slower" was a conservative figure to account for extra
processing time for multi-user, security, and recovery overhead of dbs
such as SQL Server; on the other hand XDb1 has the overhead of
variable data structures. The "2X" should be adjusted appropriately
for the situation of generating a report from normalized data.
7. Remove the variability of disk I/O by making measurements for
activity in RAM only.
8. Last place pays winner :)
Would anybody from Oracle, IBM or FirstSQL like to join?
From the original post:
"$1000 to the first person who replicates the equivalent of
www.xdb1.com/Example/Ex076.asp using the relational model. To claim
the prize, one needs to produce the equivalent Nearest Common Ancestor
Report from normalized and NULL-less data and the solution must be as
generic, meaning allow the user to create any hierarchy, consisting of
different types of things (each type to allow different attributes)
and each thing in the hierarchy to have any number of parents. Report
generation must not be more than 2X slower than XDb1 on equivalent
hardware."
Received on Sat Jun 05 2004 - 14:18:43 CDT
![]() |
![]() |