Re: Ah, but who has better parties?

From: Laconic2 <laconic2_at_comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 08:10:29 -0400
Message-ID: <qvudnfIthvB6tirdRVn-sw_at_comcast.com>

"Alfredo Novoa" <alfredo_at_ncs.es> wrote in message news:40b7135a.449586_at_news-read3.maxwell.syr.edu...
> Like in the stone age.

When was the stone age? Received on Fri May 28 2004 - 14:10:29 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: x: "Re: SQL for Modelling Generalization Hierarchy"
Previous message: Laconic2: "Re: Is Ingres yet relational?"
Maybe in reply to: Dawn M. Wolthuis: "Ah, but who has better parties?"
In reply to Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Ah, but who has better parties?"
Next in thread: x: "Re: SQL for Modelling Generalization Hierarchy"
Reply: x: "Re: Ah, but who has better parties?"
Reply: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Ah, but who has better parties?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message