Oracle FAQ

Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: Ah, but who has better parties?

Re: Ah, but who has better parties?

From: Laconic2 <laconic2_at_comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 08:10:29 -0400
Message-ID: <qvudnfIthvB6tirdRVn-sw@comcast.com>

"Alfredo Novoa" <alfredo_at_ncs.es> wrote in message news:40b7135a.449586_at_news-read3.maxwell.syr.edu...
> Like in the stone age.

When was the stone age? Received on Fri May 28 2004 - 07:10:29 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: x: "Re: SQL for Modelling Generalization Hierarchy"
Previous message: Laconic2: "Re: Is Ingres yet relational?"
In reply to: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Ah, but who has better parties?"
Next in thread: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Ah, but who has better parties?"
Reply: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: Ah, but who has better parties?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US