Re: database systems and organizational intelligence

From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 01:40:21 +0200
Message-ID: <40b52ae3$0$33919$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>

Dawn M. Wolthuis wrote:

> Alfredo Novoa wrote:

>>...Very very wrong. A relation is a constant.
> So is a function.

Just a few posts ago, you wanted to store something in a function. You can have it both ways - if the context makes enough of a difference. In this case I'ld prefer you'ld stick with one. Received on Thu May 27 2004 - 01:40:21 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Gene Wirchenko: "Re: Ah, but who has better parties?"
Previous message: Neo: "Re: Nearest Common Ancestor Report (XDb1's $1000 Challenge)"
In reply to: Dawn M. Wolthuis: "Re: database systems and organizational intelligence"
Next in thread: Neo: "Re: Nearest Common Ancestor Report (XDb1's $1000 Challenge)"
Reply: Dawn M. Wolthuis: "Re: database systems and organizational intelligence"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message