Re: Ah, but who has better parties?
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 09:28:50 -0700
Message-ID: <2cd9b0tboom6aghcs097ktkt37ti591rj2_at_4ax.com>
Leandro Guimaraens Faria Corsetti Dutra <leandro_at_dutra.fastmail.fm>
wrote:
>Em Tue, 25 May 2004 19:01:46 -0700, Gene Wirchenko escreveu:
>
>> xBASE does have SQL. Talking of converting from xBASE to SQL is
>> less than totally accurate.
>
> You are totally offbase. xBase as a language is not SQL, and
>is even less relational than SQL. Not only that, xBase *products*'s
Are you being deliberately obtuse? I have said that xBASE has SQL, not that it is SQL.
>SQL flavours and capabilities suffer from having to support
>navigational access too.
I find that having the two approaches is a strength. xBASE record-oriented commands are very useful with a result set.
> Keep insisting this and I will be forced to ignore you, as I
>am doing already with the other non-relational ignarii.
Something like throwing a hissy fit? Well, if you must.
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:
I have preferences. You have biases. He/She has prejudices.Received on Wed May 26 2004 - 18:28:50 CEST