Re: Navigation vs Relational operators

From: x <x-false_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 14:27:57 +0300
Message-ID: <40a9f26b$1_at_post.usenet.com>


  • Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****

"Karel Miklav" <karel_at_inetis.spppambait.com> wrote in message news:c8cmdl0210m_at_enews3.newsguy.com...
> x wrote:
> > I think Relational is more like using a subway or railway system rather
than
> > a taxi.
>
> No way. Relational engine must navigate through it's structures like
> hell to find the data, it's just that the end user doesn't have to know
> EVERYTHING about it. And there lies a problem: you may be an owner of a
> shitty RDB implementation.

But it needs to know something (beside final destination). At least the stations where it needs to switch trains. :-)

> There are good uses for relational databases and other technologies as
> well. And this is a technical issue, I don't see the point in using
> parables.

Well, I want to use taxies but I am unable to find one :-)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

  • Usenet.com - The #1 Usenet Newsgroup Service on The Planet! *** http://www.usenet.com Unlimited Download - 19 Seperate Servers - 90,000 groups - Uncensored -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Received on Tue May 18 2004 - 13:27:57 CEST

Original text of this message