Re: Noninferential vs. inferential DBMS

• Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****

"Paul" <paul_at_test.com> wrote in message
news:R55qc.4379$wI4.499382_at_wards.force9.net...
> x wrote:
> > Or is projecting the tuple
> > ('Fred Smith', 123, 10, 10,000)
> > onto
> > ('Fred Smith', 123, 10)
> > an example of inference?
> >
> > The answer is:
> > This depends if the projection was done by the DBMS or by the
application
> > programmer/database user.
> > If the DBMS had a rule that said (a, b, c , d, e) -->(a, b, c) and this
rule
> > was used, then projecting the tuple is an example of inference.
>
> But by itself the tuple ('Fred Smith', 123, 10, 10000) is meaningless.

Yes. By itself.
But this does not mean the DBMS cannot do anything with it except store and retrieve.

> The DBMS just does does the mechanics, it can't know that the first
> column is a name, etc. In other words it can't know the real-world
> interpretation of the underlying predicate. So I'm still not sure what
> is meant by the DBMS inferring things.

Yes. The DBMS does the mechanics.
It don't have to KNOW the real-world interpretation to do that. It only need to have some rules that tell the DBMS what it can or cannot do.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

• Usenet.com - The #1 Usenet Newsgroup Service on The Planet! *** http://www.usenet.com Unlimited Download - 19 Seperate Servers - 90,000 groups - Uncensored -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=