Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: Ah, but who has better parties?

Re: Ah, but who has better parties?

From: Gene Wirchenko <genew_at_mail.ocis.net>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 17:20:41 -0700
Message-ID: <ugkia0h3m0dkq5q27ujt9t6t7pevhojtv7@4ax.com>


Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra <leandro_at_dutra.fastmail.fm> wrote:

[snip]

>>> Where I'm working we're finishing a retail and warehousing project for a
>>> supermarket chain replacing their old xBase system, because that system
>>> can't be data mined except by programming.

[snip]

> The anedocte I told is not in any manner about industry
>standards. It is about technical capabilities inherent in general
>data models, in this case navigational (xBase) vs quasi- or
>sub-relational (SQL).

[snip]

> Now to qualify that, I know indeed Pick is live and kicking.
>But so is xBase, and sequential files at that. And that doesn't make
>them relevant anymore than Egypt still being quite a country makes
>them the world superpower they once was.

     Ah, you may be out-of-date wrt xBASE. Various xBASEs have had SQL for up to fifteen years now. I use Microsoft Visual FoxPro, and it most assuredly has SQL capabilities.

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko

Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:

     I have preferences.
     You have biases.
     He/She has prejudices.
Received on Mon May 17 2004 - 19:20:41 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US