| Oracle FAQ | Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid | |
Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: Ah, but who has better parties?
Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra <leandro_at_dutra.fastmail.fm>
wrote:
[snip]
>>> Where I'm working we're finishing a retail and warehousing project for a
>>> supermarket chain replacing their old xBase system, because that system
>>> can't be data mined except by programming.
[snip]
> The anedocte I told is not in any manner about industry
>standards. It is about technical capabilities inherent in general
>data models, in this case navigational (xBase) vs quasi- or
>sub-relational (SQL).
[snip]
> Now to qualify that, I know indeed Pick is live and kicking.
>But so is xBase, and sequential files at that. And that doesn't make
>them relevant anymore than Egypt still being quite a country makes
>them the world superpower they once was.
Ah, you may be out-of-date wrt xBASE. Various xBASEs have had SQL for up to fifteen years now. I use Microsoft Visual FoxPro, and it most assuredly has SQL capabilities.
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:
I have preferences.
You have biases.
He/She has prejudices.
Received on Mon May 17 2004 - 19:20:41 CDT
![]() |
![]() |