Re: Transitive Closure

From: x <x-false_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 16:07:11 +0300
Message-ID: <40a8b82f$1_at_post.usenet.com>


  • Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****

"Alfredo Novoa" <alfredo_at_ncs.es> wrote in message news:40a8b5ac.11177552_at_news.tehnicom.net...
> On Mon, 17 May 2004 15:34:31 +0300, "x" <x-false_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >Commutativity does make sense with unary operators.
> >M--f-->M--g-->M
>
> I don't understand this.
>
> >fg = gf or fg != gf
>
> It is a binary operator. f and g are two operands.
>
But is WITH unary operators :-)
Let's drop this discussion.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

  • Usenet.com - The #1 Usenet Newsgroup Service on The Planet! *** http://www.usenet.com Unlimited Download - 19 Seperate Servers - 90,000 groups - Uncensored -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Received on Mon May 17 2004 - 15:07:11 CEST

Original text of this message