Re: c.d.theory glossary (repost)

mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org> wrote:

>Yay! A lively day for this newsgroup.
>I skimmed a little and even the insult/discussion
>ratio is near zero :-)
>
>I'm affraid I can't keep up with you all at this rate.
>
>Gene Wirchenko wrote:
>
>> mAsterdam wrote:

[snip]

>>>[NULL]
>>>The insanity bit. No! The humility marker.
>>>mu: The absence of an answer to a question which requires an answer.
>>
>> Cute, but not of much practical help.
>
>The bit/marker was taken from discussions here,
>I contributed mu. I did not do that because
>I think it's cute (I *do* think it's cute), but
>because I think it somehow touches
>the essence of these problems.

     Maybe. I can see that it deals with it somehow, but look at it from the point of view of someone who does not know why the battle about null values.

>[snip]
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Gene Wirchenko
>>
>> Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:
>> I have preferences.
>> You have biases.
>> He/She has prejudices.
>
>:-)
>
>Gene, would you mind if I used this for cdt glossary 0.0.3 ?

     Properly attributed: sure.

>Now I am going to read some of all those other posts.

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko

Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:

     I have preferences.
     You have biases.
     He/She has prejudices.