Re: Date is Incomplete - database application software and database theory

From: Dawn M. Wolthuis <dwolt_at_tincat-group.com>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 17:29:17 -0500
Message-ID: <c83h8c$q5s$1_at_news.netins.net>


"mountain man" <hobbit_at_southern_seaweed.com.op> wrote in message news:Rwbpc.38460$TT.23810_at_news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> "Alfredo Novoa" <alfredo_at_ncs.es> wrote in message
> news:40a4ba33.3107788_at_news.wanadoo.es...
> > On Wed, 12 May 2004 09:22:12 GMT, "mountain man"
> > <hobbit_at_southern_seaweed.com.op> wrote:
> >
> > >My reading of Date allows me to assert his detailed
> > >coverage of the theoretical ground of database
> > >systems technology lacks any meaningful discussion
> > >of the (one would implicity assume exists) application
> > >system software which is to "inhabit" the system.
> > >
> > >This is radical incompleteness of theory.
> >
> > No, they are completely independent things.
>
> Which of these two things does not
> share the data schema?

and which has access to a constraints engine or at least constraint specs? If you treat these as separate, then you will have considerable edundancy. --dawn Received on Sat May 15 2004 - 00:29:17 CEST

Original text of this message