Re: c.d.theory glossary (repost)
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 21:38:45 +0200
Message-ID: <40a52048$0$576$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>
Yay! A lively day for this newsgroup.
I'm affraid I can't keep up with you all at this rate.
Gene Wirchenko wrote:
> mAsterdam wrote:
I skimmed a little and even the insult/discussion
ratio is near zero :-)
>>This glossary seeks to limit lengthy misunderstandings in >>comp.database.theory.> databases for quite a while, but I would like to learn more theory.
>
> It would help if it were more plainly written. I have been using
Same here, but before we can query data someone has to gather some.
> Some of the definitions here are rather obtuse. Examples follow:
>>[Class]...
> I am glad that I already know what a class is.
>>[Domain]...
> Huh?
Adressed by Dawn. >>[NULL] >>The insanity bit. No! The humility marker. >>mu: The absence of an answer to a question which requires an answer.
>
> Cute, but not of much practical help.
The bit/marker was taken from discussions here,
I contributed mu. I did not do that because
I think it's cute (I *do* think it's cute), but
because I think it somehow touches
the essence of these problems.
[snip]
> Sincerely,
>
> Gene Wirchenko
>
> Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:
> I have preferences.
> You have biases.
> He/She has prejudices.
:-)
Gene, would you mind if I used this for cdt glossary 0.0.3 ?
Now I am going to read some of all those other posts. Received on Fri May 14 2004 - 21:38:45 CEST