Re: Noninferential vs. inferential DBMS

From: x <x-false_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 17:38:19 +0300
Message-ID: <40a4d90e$1_at_post.usenet.com>


  • Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****

"Paul" <paul_at_test.com> wrote in message news:ew4pc.4191$NK4.363507_at_stones.force9.net...
> x wrote:
> >>For example, suppose you have an employee table, you could get out of it
> >>that "Fred Smith has empid=123, works in dept 10 and has a salary of
> >>10,000". But you wouldn't be able to ask "Is there an employee called
> >>Fred Smith?
> >
> > Inferential DBMS means there are some inferences carried out by the
DBMS.
> > So a non-inferential DBMS won't carry out any inferences.
>
> So if my database stores the proposition:
> "Fred Smith has empid=123, works in dept 10 and has a salary of 10,000"
>
> I can infer the proposition:
> "Fred Smith has empid=123 and works in dept 10"
>
> I suppose this inference is really done by the DBA in some sense,
> because for all the DBMS knows, the query could mean:
> "Fred Smith is age 123 and has shoes that are size 10"
>
> Is this the kind of inference you mean?
> Inferring the real-world *meaning* of the data?

No. I mean automated logical inferences performed by the DBMS.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

  • Usenet.com - The #1 Usenet Newsgroup Service on The Planet! *** http://www.usenet.com Unlimited Download - 19 Seperate Servers - 90,000 groups - Uncensored -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Received on Fri May 14 2004 - 16:38:19 CEST

Original text of this message