Re: Ah, but who has better parties?

From: Marshall Spight <mspight_at_dnai.com>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 08:17:17 GMT
Message-ID: <hg%oc.46356$iF6.4323848@attbi_s02>

"Dawn M. Wolthuis" <dwolt_at_tincat-group.com> wrote in message news:c81d4m$kvp$1_at_news.netins.net...
> There are many examples of
> companies that decided to move to that new requirement in the 80's or 90's
> of a "relational database" and ended up belly up.

Correlation is not causation.

Marshall Received on Fri May 14 2004 - 03:17:17 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: davidp_at_rgv.rr.com: "13 year old Iraqi girl raped by American Soldiers"
Previous message: Marshall Spight: "Re: Ah, but who has better parties?"
In reply to: Dawn M. Wolthuis: "Re: Ah, but who has better parties?"
Next in thread: Eric Kaun: "Re: Ah, but who has better parties?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US