Re: c.d.theory glossary (repost)

From: Gene Wirchenko <genew_at_mail.ocis.net>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 21:44:22 -0700
Message-ID: <ufj8a0hgtuaq4q5tlrfqsfi5k7sb61gen8_at_4ax.com>


"Dawn M. Wolthuis" <dwolt_at_tincat-group.com> wrote:

[snip]

>That one was my contribution (as with function and domain, IIRC) and is the
>mathematical definition since there are many on this list who like precision
>(I among them, at times). Do you have another you would like to add for a
>list of valid defs of "relation"?

     No, and that is the point. If I did, I would give it, but since I am unsure enough, I would like to learn a good definition.

     I have the same problem with the www.dbdebunk.com. The statements may be quite logical (or be total nonsense), but I can not operate at that level. Until it gets simplified, I will not be able to.

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko

Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:

     I have preferences.
     You have biases.
     He/She has prejudices.
Received on Fri May 14 2004 - 06:44:22 CEST

Original text of this message