Re: Ah, but who has better parties?

From: Dawn M. Wolthuis <dwolt_at_tincat-group.com>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 08:38:12 -0500
Message-ID: <c7vtoa$o12$1@news.netins.net>

"Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra" <leandro_at_dutra.fastmail.fm> wrote in message news:pan.2004.05.13.12.08.23.162778_at_dutra.fastmail.fm...
> Em Wed, 12 May 2004 21:29:42 -0500, Dawn M. Wolthuis escreveu:
>
> > I hope you can see that the point I'm making is that there is some
> > aspect of personality involved in what approaches are taken to
> > addressing similar problems
>
> I am finding your lack of understanding of *the problem*
> tiresome.
>
> See the name of the newsgroup. c.d.*theory*.
>
> If personality is relevant to Science, it is not Science but
> Postmodernism.
>
> But then perhaps you're Postmodernist.
>
> Or not quite Postmodernist, just popular Anglo-Saxon with the
> typical contempt for Science and infatuation with pragmatism.

Or maybe I'm looking at all angles of "database theory"?

Please provide a full definition of "theory" -- perhaps my dictionary is different from yours.
Thanks. --dawn Received on Thu May 13 2004 - 08:38:12 CDT