Re: c.d.theory lexicon overview

"Anthony W. Youngman" <wol_at_thewolery.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>In message <sfhr90tq6gocq3ib2u0ddh11q55t9s2pk5_at_4ax.com>, Gene Wirchenko
><genew_at_mail.ocis.net> writes
>>>And while the two may morph into each other, Computer Science seems to
>>>belong firmly in the "pure maths" category which, by definition, is not
>>>scientific at all.
>>
>> Say what? I would put it in the category of pure science.
>
>What do you mean by pure science?
>
>I would say that if something such as "pure science" exists, it would be
>very "hands on" "get your hands dirty" type stuff. And most definitely
>NOT an exercise mostly in brain-power.

     I think you are confusing application of science with the science itself, that is, implementation vs. analysis.

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko

Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation:

     I have preferences.
     You have biases.
     He/She has prejudices.