Oracle FAQ Your Portal to the Oracle Knowledge Grid
HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US
 

Home -> Community -> Usenet -> comp.databases.theory -> Re: MV counterexample

Re: MV counterexample

From: Dawn M. Wolthuis <dwolt_at_tincat-group.com>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 09:24:22 -0500
Message-ID: <c7g671$96a$1@news.netins.net>


"Karel Miklav" <karel_at_lovetemple.adbloccker.net> wrote in message news:c7f2cq01vb1_at_enews2.newsguy.com...
> x wrote:

<snip>
> I mostly do web applications; there are at least three pieces of
> software and if I forget the client then business logic is present at
> least in server and the database. RDBs have their limits (history of
> data, metadata...) and if your app. isn't some completely simple SQL
> glue, you end up with two models. If you're on tight budget you probably
> throw away one, but I'm not gonna tell which one here :)

I'd recommend tossing out the set of constraints that is dependent on a single database vendor ;-)

> I'd definitely like to see constraints in just one place, but this
> concept of database and server will have to go away.

On this we agree. --dawn Received on Fri May 07 2004 - 09:24:22 CDT

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US