Re: Len Silverston's Universal Data Models sanity

From: x <x-false_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 12:17:51 +0300
Message-ID: <409b537e$1_at_post.usenet.com>


  • Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****

"Pascal Damian" <pascaldamian_at_icqmail.com> wrote in message news:6bd4a4d3.0405070056.5d8a6c61_at_posting.google.com...
> Interesting. In what way does the Brazilian accounting model differ
> from US (and other parts of the world)? Surely the basic concepts and
> entities of double entry, debit/credit, accounts /chart of accounts,
> transactions, etc are the same? What does the Brazilian accounting
> model look like? What parts of the US accounting model do you find
> strange?

I don't know about Brazilian or US accounting, but consider this "analogy":

Interesting. In what way does the Cobol language differ from C language (and other programming languages of the world)? Surely the basic concepts and entities of data types, control structures, variables,
etc are the same? What does the Cobol language look like? What parts of the C language do you find strange?

Note: Any analogy between the accounting models of Brasil and US and the Cobol and C programming languages is pure coincidence.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

  • Usenet.com - The #1 Usenet Newsgroup Service on The Planet! *** http://www.usenet.com Unlimited Download - 19 Seperate Servers - 90,000 groups - Uncensored -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Received on Fri May 07 2004 - 11:17:51 CEST

Original text of this message