Re: MV counterexample

From: Chris Hoess <choess_at_stwing.upenn.edu>
Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 20:25:42 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <slrnc9l7q6.1tb.choess_at_force.stwing.upenn.edu>

In article <c7e6h3$vq1$1_at_news.netins.net>, Dawn M. Wolthuis wrote:
>
> and it seems to be a model "IN PRODUCTION" at practially every company --
> quite impressive that WWW "data model" eh? --dawn

Yes, ranking right up there with the "Big Ball of Mud" software development model in adoption and success.
<URL:http://discuss.fogcreek.com/joelonsoftware/default.asp?cmd=show& ixPost=137486&ixReplies=11>

-- 
Chris Hoess

Received on Thu May 06 2004 - 22:25:42 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: VIEWS compared to Nodes as Windows into data"
Previous message: Mikito Harakiri: "Re: What predicates the following relation represents"
Maybe in reply to: Karel Miklav: "MV counterexample"
In reply to Dawn M. Wolthuis: "Re: MV counterexample"
Next in thread: Alfredo Novoa: "Re: VIEWS compared to Nodes as Windows into data"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message