Re: MV counterexample

From: mAsterdam <mAsterdam_at_vrijdag.org>
Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 20:42:15 +0200
Message-ID: <409a8708$0$567$e4fe514c_at_news.xs4all.nl>

Dawn M. Wolthuis wrote:

> Combining these very conceptually simple concepts of: string (of data),
> graph (for navigation), and function (mapping) with data is so intuitive for
> the human brain that I would guess that if you put these concepts together
> into some sort of web of information, it just might catch on in a world-wide
> fashion.

Nah. Incomplete. No enforced referential constraints. You would get stale links in no time, and your database would be corrupted. End of exercise.

It would make a nice TLA, though. Received on Thu May 06 2004 - 20:42:15 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra: "Re: Len Silverston's Universal Data Models sanity"
Previous message: Dawn M. Wolthuis: "Re: What predicates the following relation represents"
In reply to Dawn M. Wolthuis: "Re: MV counterexample"
Next in thread: Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra: "Re: Len Silverston's Universal Data Models sanity"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message