Re: c.d.theory glossary - RELATION

From: Laconic2 <laconic2_at_comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 15:15:56 -0400
Message-ID: <8p6dnd1z4OqsBwvd4p2dnA_at_comcast.com>

I looked over the Codd paper over the weekend. In the paper, Codd distinguishes between "RELATIONS" and "RELATIONSHIPS".

I don't the the difference between what Codd called a "relationship" in that paper and what Peter Chen called a "Relationship" when he introduced the E-R model. Received on Mon May 03 2004 - 21:15:56 CEST

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Laconic2: "Re: VIEWS compared to Nodes as Windows into data"
Previous message: Laconic2: "Re: VIEWS compared to Nodes as Windows into data"
Maybe in reply to: x: "Re: c.d.theory glossary - RELATION"
Next in thread: Dawn M. Wolthuis: "Re: c.d.theory glossary - RELATION"
Reply: Dawn M. Wolthuis: "Re: c.d.theory glossary - RELATION"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message