Re: c.d.theory glossary - RELATION

From: x <x-false_at_yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 15:57:49 +0300
Message-ID: <40924c96_at_post.usenet.com>


  • Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****

"Laconic2" <laconic2_at_comcast.net> wrote in message news:e7ydnZBo8LpD2w_dRVn-ug_at_comcast.com...
> I would have said that "An entity is DESCRIBED BY a set of attributes."
>
> I think REPRESENTED is too strong.
It was not my choice.
As I said, I found that on a web page about ER modeling.

Do you also think REPRESENTED is too strong in the context of relational model (not in the context of ER modeling) ?

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

  • Usenet.com - The #1 Usenet Newsgroup Service on The Planet! *** http://www.usenet.com Unlimited Download - 19 Seperate Servers - 90,000 groups - Uncensored -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Received on Fri Apr 30 2004 - 14:57:49 CEST

Original text of this message