Re: List Database Theories

"D Guntermann" <guntermann_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message news:HwwtI3.vn_at_news.boeing.com...
>
> "Dawn M. Wolthuis" <dwolt_at_tincat-group.com> wrote in message
> news:c6plm8$dt1$1_at_news.netins.net...
> > "D Guntermann" <guntermann_at_hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:HwwqH9.9tG_at_news.boeing.com...
> > >
> > > "Mike Preece" <michael_at_preece.net> wrote in message
> > > news:1b0b566c.0404281508.6fc04a6_at_posting.google.com...
> > > > "Dawn M. Wolthuis" <dwolt_at_tincat-group.com> wrote in message
> > > news:<c6lirr$i7u$1_at_news.netins.net>...
>
> [snip]
>
> > >
> > > Darn. The anti-Dawn posting conspiracy theory was so scandalous, so
> > > scintillating, so so intriguing. I was waiting with baited breath to
> find
> > > out who had so much power. My bet was on Bob B. :-)
> >
> > Wow and I hadn't even considered taking it personally as "anti-Dawn" --
>
> Correction on my part -- Not "anti-Dawn".
>
> > -- just
> > thought maybe someone was REALLY tired of talking ABOUT database theory
> > instead of inside one.
>
> I was trying to use humor. Never mind. I was never ever really good at
it,
> and it doesn't seem to play well here.

Ah, but I WAS humored and even liked the "anti-Dawn" part ;-)

My humor plays better elsewhere too -- it seemed an angry bunch when I started talking on cdt and anger humor isn't my game. Hopefully we didn't lose the humor when we lost (most of) the anger (and THANKS to those who helped with THAT). Cheers! --dawn Received on Thu Apr 29 2004 - 04:34:50 CEST