Re: Date's First Great Blunder
From: Lemming <thiswillbounce_at_bumblbee.demon.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 00:43:34 +0100
Message-ID: <uag0901rirrmpg5hn9ue1sfusdiom52cme_at_4ax.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 00:43:34 +0100
Message-ID: <uag0901rirrmpg5hn9ue1sfusdiom52cme_at_4ax.com>
On 28 Apr 2004 16:39:38 -0700, michael_at_preece.net (Mike Preece) wrote:
>"Dawn M. Wolthuis" <dwolt_at_tincat-group.com> wrote in message news:<c613pl$a1u$1_at_news.netins.net>...
>[snip]
>> From a
>> global standpoint, that is a common marketing strategy -- classify
>> competitor products and your own and then attact the super-classes.
>[snip]
>
>OT: From time to time one comes across a truly great typo - and I
>think this is one of them. "Attact" could be seen as a either one or a
>combination of "attract" and "attack" - and conjures up the image of
>drawing prey in for the kill.
Wake me up when you are done.
Lemming
-- Curiosity *may* have killed Schrodinger's cat.Received on Thu Apr 29 2004 - 01:43:34 CEST