Re: Date's First Great Blunder
From: Mike Preece <michael_at_preece.net>
Date: 28 Apr 2004 16:39:38 -0700
Message-ID: <1b0b566c.0404281539.6f86e937_at_posting.google.com>
Date: 28 Apr 2004 16:39:38 -0700
Message-ID: <1b0b566c.0404281539.6f86e937_at_posting.google.com>
"Dawn M. Wolthuis" <dwolt_at_tincat-group.com> wrote in message news:<c613pl$a1u$1_at_news.netins.net>...
[snip]
OT: From time to time one comes across a truly great typo - and I
think this is one of them. "Attact" could be seen as a either one or a
combination of "attract" and "attack" - and conjures up the image of
> From a
> global standpoint, that is a common marketing strategy -- classify
> competitor products and your own and then attact the super-classes.
[snip]