> > No one is arguing that Classical Mechanics isn't accurate enough for
> > the scope of a human's typical everday experience. You missed the
> > point.
>
> I don't think I did actually. Wol was arguing that Classical
> Mechanics "doesn't tally with reality" period.
Maybe it is better said, Classical Mechanics is x% accurate for a
limited scope (planets and projectiles) and degrades considerable
beyond it. Where as Quantum, is x% accurate for a broader scope which
includes Classical Mechanics' scope.
Received on Tue Apr 20 2004 - 23:42:25 CDT
