Re: why do you apply undo before redo?
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 16:04:25 GMT
"Laconic2" <laconic2_at_comcast.net> wrote in message
> What if you were "in the middle of committing" at the moment of the
A "commit" is consummated when a commit marker of some sort is physically written to the disk (not just flushed from cache). Upon recovery, if the commit marker cannot be found on disk, the transaction didn't occur. If it is found, the recovery process is responsible for rolling any logged changes into the physical database files. There is no middle ground.
> Couldn't either the redo log, or the database, or the two of them taken
> together be in an inconsistent state?
A good DBMS will not have any point at which the log and database are not in a recoverable state.
> Wouldn't it be necessary to resolve that inconsistency, if possible, by
> rolling back transactions in progress, before applying the redo to the
Received on Tue Apr 20 2004 - 18:04:25 CEST